In accordance with section 106.03 of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC),
each state agency is required to review each of its rules in the Ohio Administrative
Code a minimum of once every five years. The intent of the review is to ensure that
Administrative Code rules are clearly written and that program requirements are
accurate, up-to-date and clearly expressed. To the extent possible, unnecessary
paperwork will be eliminated, local agencies will be given increased flexibility,
and any adverse impact on businesses will be eliminated or reduced. As a result
of the review, the agency may amend the rule; rescind the rule; or continue the
rule without amendment.
The rules have been subject to a review by the Joint Committee on
Agency Rule Review (JCARR). The rules will become effective on 9/1/2018.
Chapter 4000
5101:4-4-13 "Food assistance- types of excluded
income."
This rule describes the income exclusions for the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP). This rule has been amended. Paragraph (C)(1)(x) has been
amended to implement final regulations issued by the United States Department of
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. The term "food assistance" was
replaced with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). No other substantive
changes were made.
Chapter 6000
5101:4-6-04 "Food assistance- students enrolled
in an institution of higher education."
This rule describes the eligibility requirements for students who
are attending institutions of higher education. This rule has been amended. Language
from paragraph (B)(11)(d) was moved to (B)(11) to align with the federal regulation.
Also, the term "food assistance" was replaced with "Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)." No other substantive changes were made.
5101:4-6-07 "Food assistance- strikers."
This rule describes the eligibility of strikers in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This rule has been amended. The term "food
assistance" has been replaced with "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP)". The opening paragraph was stricken as it was unnecessarily
redundant to paragraph (B). Other minor changes were made for clarity; no substantive
changes were made.